Choose language

I will add …

…a few words about me, why I dropped Physics, Geophysics and after years of vacillation and hanging in life became an artist.

I was a bad physicist. Physics was easy for me at school. I don't know why. At the University it was difficult. It is a very large and had complex mathematics beyond my abilities and beyond the knowledge of mathematics, which provides a mandatory program of the physics Faculty. Besides there were interests in the environment, which were strongly heated by a trip to the geological party in Siberia, other interests of youth. A sharp change in the profession was prevented by the threat of getting into the army. I did not want to be in the barracks instead of the University. And when the choice of specialization came, I after some wanderings in the departments left in Geophysics. And later at work I went into programming, to simple codes of the computer, away from physics, Geophysics and seismology, to which these programs concerned.

Challenges in Geophysics are difficult too. I don't even know how to begin about it. I did what was required. On seismic waves in the Earth I determined its structure, selected models on the computer. May be I did that too well. In a situation where there was no one model that was consistent with the seismic data, computer found hundreds. And the task was meaningless. I was ashamed of myself, especially after receiving the PhD degree. I was made a senior fellow, and I could tell the younger nothing except to program that was recommended.

Many years have passed. Now I'm an artist. Good one. I did not graduate from any school in this specialty. The most creative, the metaphysical element of work is access to the theme of the picture. Different content comes during this process to mind.

You see, waves propagating medium blurred. For example, if lightning strikes close by, the sound is sharp and short. And what remotely - so rumbling. To calculate it is not possible, it depends on the location of clouds, terrain, and why to do it.

With seismic waves happens approximately the same. Blow in the epicenter falling apart on the waves of various types: volume, surface, reflected etc. They have different speed, picture of seismograms with increasing of distance is spreading. And even if you take only one wave, for example, longitudinal, probably she is spreading too. Eh, I held once such data in hand but not thought to measure. Calculate also will not work. The structure of the Earth is not known, many of heterogeneity are comparable with wavelength. Mathematical apparatus to calculate such waves does not exist.

Of course, waves can blur different. But in General, spectrum shifts to more slow oscillations. The red shift you can say. And nobody explain that as effect of Doppler - broadening of the Earth. The absurdity is obvious.

In relation to the Universe and the red shift of the light of the stars it's done. Universe is expanding, even with the acceleration, Big Bang out of nothing, dark energy. They dance from the effect of Doppler. Seemingly they reached the point of absurdity, in mathematics there is a proof by contradiction, but no, they insist.

According to the theory of the photon there is no time in it. As it flew out of the stars, so it arrived, even if it flew billions of years. And for this time a lot happened with him. It flew in gravitational fields. Imagine the ball in space. When it approach the star or planet it takes the shape of a melon, elongated in the direction of the center of gravity. The gravitational force can even broke it, as was the case with the asteroid that fell on Jupiter. Irreversible change it was. So may be the ball will fly after gravity shake not quite as the ball. You know, there is a residual deformation, tidal friction, damped free vibrations. Or it will start to rotate. All this changes need energy. So it may slow down.

Maybe the photon also is stretched, red a little, and is not returned to former state when removed from the star. When approaching the star it gains energy, removing loses. The parameters should be changed. However, in the theory there is only one - the energy or frequency. They are rigidly connected by Planck's constant. Energy before the arrival and after the removal must be equal. Or maybe not exact? Wave had a lot of parameters such as length, duration, amplitude... Is the photon such a strong thing that gravity shakes make nothing to it? It either exists or not? Oddly strength it is. May be the theory with respect to it is too rough?
And the red shift can be explained by the complexity of the path of a photon, and not by the speed of removal of the source. The universe is not arranged to make it easier to calculate.

Accordingly, may be specialists in the Big Bang and dark energy take too much on themselves?